Let's start with 5 quick facts to contextualize the assessment.
Required field
Whole number only
Required field
Required field
Required field
Required field
Cláusula 4 · 10%
4. Context of the organization
Evaluates whether the company understands its environment, interested parties and QMS scope.
1. Has the company identified the internal issues (culture, resources, structure) and external issues (market, competition, regulation) that affect the QMS?
2. Are the relevant interested parties (customers, suppliers, employees, authorities) and their expectations identified?
3. Is the scope of the QMS defined in writing, indicating which products, services and locations it covers?
4. Are the QMS processes mapped and understood in terms of how they interact (inputs, outputs, owners)?
Cláusula 5 · 15%
5. Leadership
Evaluates top management commitment, the quality policy and role assignments.
1. Does top management demonstrate commitment to the QMS through visible actions (allocating resources, participating in reviews, communicating the importance of quality)?
2. Is there a documented quality policy, communicated to all personnel and understood in practical terms?
3. Are QMS roles, responsibilities and authorities defined and communicated to the relevant personnel?
4. Does management make QMS decisions based on performance data rather than intuition alone?
Cláusula 6 · 12%
6. Planning
Evaluates risk and opportunity management, measurable objectives and change planning.
1. Are risks and opportunities that affect the QMS and company objectives identified and assessed?
2. Are there measurable quality objectives with assigned owners and due dates?
3. Is the progress of quality objectives monitored regularly, with corrective actions when they deviate?
4. Are significant changes in processes, products or the QMS formally planned before being implemented?
Cláusula 7 · 15%
7. Support
Evaluates resources, personnel competence, communication and documented information control.
1. Does the company have the resources (personnel, infrastructure, equipment) needed to operate the QMS effectively?
2. Are measuring equipment used in critical processes calibrated, identified and controlled?
3. Is there a process to identify training needs and develop personnel competencies?
4. Is documented information (procedures, forms, records) controlled with current versions and orderly access, not scattered across Drive or emails?
5. Are there defined channels to communicate QMS topics internally (changes, results, alerts)?
Cláusula 8 · 25%
8. Operation
Evaluates operational control, customer and supplier relationships, and traceability.
1. Are operational processes planned with defined controls, acceptance criteria and resources?
2. Are customer requirements reviewed and formally accepted before committing to an order or contract?
3. Is there a formal process for customer communication (inquiries, complaints, feedback)?
4. Are critical suppliers evaluated, selected and monitored with documented criteria?
5. Do products or services go through quality controls during production or service delivery?
6. Is there traceability that allows identifying batches, processes or responsible parties for each product/service delivered?
7. Is there a clear procedure to handle nonconforming product or service and record the decisions taken?
Cláusula 9 · 13%
9. Performance evaluation
Evaluates indicators, customer satisfaction, internal audits and management review.
1. Are key performance indicators (KPIs) of the QMS and its processes measured, with results analyzed periodically?
2. Is customer satisfaction evaluated through formal methods (surveys, interviews, complaints analysis)?
3. Are internal audits of the QMS performed with a planned program and qualified auditors?
4. Does management conduct formal QMS reviews at least once a year, with a documented agenda and minutes?
Cláusula 10 · 10%
10. Improvement
Evaluates nonconformity management, corrective actions and continuous improvement culture.
1. Do detected nonconformities generate corrective actions that address the root cause, not just the symptom?
2. Is the effectiveness of corrective actions tracked until they are formally closed?
3. Is there a culture and formal mechanisms to propose and implement continuous improvements (suggestions, Kaizen projects, etc.)?
Total maturity score
—/100
—
Critical gaps identified
Details available after generating the report.
0
Generate your full report with detailed clause-by-clause diagnosis and specific recommendations
Generate your full report
Leave your details to unlock the clause-by-clause diagnosis, gaps, strengths and prioritized recommendations.
Required field
Required field
Use your business email (no Gmail, Hotmail, etc.)
Required field
Required field
Required field
Total maturity score
—/100
—
Score per clause
Clause-by-clause breakdown
Clause
Score
Level
Status
Critical gaps detected
Strengths
Prioritized recommendations
Ready to move from Excel to an organized QMS?
QualityWeb 360 gives you a simple and intuitive place to manage your entire ISO 9001 QMS: versioned documents, KPIs, corrective actions, audits and more.
Everything your company spends because things were not done right the first time: rework, returns, scrap, inspections, and more.
The QMS Maturity Assessment is a structured self-evaluation of your ISO 9001:2015 quality management system. It scores clauses 4 through 10 on a 5-level maturity scale (Initial → Optimized) and identifies critical gaps, strengths and priority actions. Studies show that most SMEs operate between Levels 2 and 3 — far from the consistent, data-driven system that Level 4 requires. Knowing your level is the first step to close that gap.
What is it?
All costs incurred from not doing things right the first time: rework, returns, scrap, re-inspection, and more.
Why measure it?
Without data, you cannot prioritize. Knowing your maturity level gives clarity on where to invest to reduce real losses immediately.
What to do with the result?
Justify quality investments, identify bottlenecks, and build an evidence-based improvement plan.
Ready to turn this diagnosis into a real action plan?